摘要
目的 以药学学科为出发点,分析比较四大国际学科排名指标体系,即夸夸雷利·西蒙兹公司(Quacquarelli Symonds,QS)、世界大学学术排名(Academic Ranking of World Universities, ARWU)、泰晤士高等教育(Times Higher Education, THE)、美国新闻和世界报道(US News & World Report, US News),为建设世界一流药学学科提供建议。方法 采用文献调研、网站调研、对比分析和内容分析的方法。结果 四大国际药学学科排名指标体系均设置了论文发布阈值、考察了教学情况和学术产出,但在学科分类、数据来源、科研产出指标、国际化指标等方面存在差异。结论 通过数据对比分析了中国高校药学学科排名的现状并从科研产出、国际合作、人才培养以及信息化建设4个层面提出了建设世界一流药学学科的建议。
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To make a detailed analysis of the four international discipline ranking index systems, namely QS, ARWU, THE and US News and provide suggestions for the construction of world-class pharmaceutical disciplines. METHODS Literature survey, website survey, comparative analysis and content analysis was used. RESULTS The four international disciplines ranking index systems all set the threshold of dissertation publication, inspected the teaching situation and academic output, but there are differences in disciplines classification, data sources, scientific research output index and internationalization index. CONCLUSION The status quo of pharmacy discipline ranking in Chinese universities is analyzed by data comparison. Suggestions on building world-class pharmaceutical discipline are put forward from four aspects: scientific research output, international cooperation, personnel training and information construction.
关键词
药学学科 /
指标体系 /
学科排名 /
提升策略
{{custom_keyword}} /
Key words
pharmaceutical discipline /
index system /
discipline ranking /
promotion strategy
{{custom_keyword}} /
孙子秋, 徐晓媛.
国际药学学科排名指标体系对比[J]. 中国药学杂志, 2019, 54(20): 1720-1726 https://doi.org/10.11669/cpj.2019.20.016
SUN Zi-qiu, XU Xiao-yuan.
Comparison of International Pharmaceutical Ranking Index System[J]. Chinese Pharmaceutical Journal, 2019, 54(20): 1720-1726 https://doi.org/10.11669/cpj.2019.20.016
中图分类号:
R951
{{custom_clc.code}}
({{custom_clc.text}})
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] ZHANG W, XU G Y, MIU N. The connotation, potential and countermeasures of building the world first-class discipline[J]. Mod Edu Manage(现代教育管理), 2016, (6):32-36.
[2] LIU J N. Establishing the idea of university discipline construction and promoting the leap-forward development of first-class disciplines[J]. China Higher Edu(中国高等教育), 2005, (S1):19-20.
[3] LIU K. An in-depth analysis for 2017 QS world university rankings by subject:taking the subject of mineral & mining engineering as an example[J]. Meitan Higher Edu(煤炭高等教育), 2017, 35(6):17-22,40.
[4] QS World University Rankings by Subject. 2018-Overview[EB/OL].[2018-9-7]. http://www.iu.qs.com/university-rankings/subject-tables/.
[5] QS World University Rankings by Subject. 2018-Methodology[EB/OL]. [2018-9-7]. https://www.topuniversities.com/subject-rankings/methodology.
[6] QS World University Rankings by Subject. 2018-Overview[EB/OL].[2018-9-7]. http://www.iu.qs.com/university-rankings/subject-tables/.
[7] QS World University Rankings by Subject. 2018-Methodology, Key Metrics & Weightings- Citations per Paper [EB/OL]. [2018-9-7]. http://www. iu. qs. com/university-rankings/subject-tables/#tab-id-3.
[8] Scopus. Journal Metrics-Cite Score 2018[EB/OL]. [2018-9-7]. https://www.scopus.com/sources.
[9] QS World University Rankings by Subject. 2018-Methodology, Key Metrics & Weightings-H Index [EB/OL]. [2018-9-7]. http://www. iu. qs.com/university-rankings/subject-tables/#tab-id-4.
[10] Library of Northwest Polytechnic University. InCites [EB/OL]. [2018-9-7]. http://tushuguan. nwpu. edu.cn/info/1462/3599.htm.
[11] Top-ranking of soft science in the world. 2018-Methodology [EB/OL]. [2018-9-7]. http://www.zuihaodaxue.com/subject-ranking/ARWU-SUBJECT-Methodology-2018.html.
[12] Times Higher Education. World University Rankings[EB/OL].[2018- 9- 7].https://www.times higher education.com/world- university- rankings/by- subject.
[13] Times Higher Education. World University Rankings 2018 by subject: clinical, pre-clinical and health methodology[EB/OL]. [2018-9-7]. https://www.times higher education.com/world-university-rankings/subject-ranking-2018-clinical-pre-clinical-and-health-methodology.
[14] US News. How US News Calculated the Best Global Universities Rankings[EB/OL].[2018- 9- 7].https://www.usnews.com/education/best-global-universities/articles/methodology.
[15] US News. How US News Calculated the Best Global Universities Subject Rankings [EB/OL].[2018-9-7]. https://www.usnews.com/education/best-global- universities/articles/ subject-rankings-methodology.
[16] SHE S F. Index systems of world university rankings by subjectsand analysis of Chinese university performance—based on the data of world university rankings by subject[J]. Shanghai J Edu Eval(上海教育评估研究), 2017, (3):26-34.
[17] US News. Peking University-best-global-universities[EB/OL].[2018- 9- 7].https://www.usnews.com/education/best-global-universities/peking-university-501148.
[18] SCHLESSELMAN L, COLEMAN C I. College and school of pharmacy characteristics associated with US News and World Report rankings[J]. Am J Pharm Edu, 2013, 77(3):55.
[19] Chinese Government Network. Relevant Heads of the Ministry of Education Answered Questions on the Overall Plan for Promoting the Construction of World-class Universities and First-class Disciplines[EB/OL].[2018-9-15]. http://www. gov.cn/zhengce/ 2015-11/05/content_2961199.htm.
[20] YANG Q, SHAO M L. Development of the American pharmacy education from the perspective of strategic planning of American association of colleges of pharmacy[J]. Chin Pharm J(中国药学杂志), 2017, 52(12):1097-1102.
[21] LI C Y, ZHANG W W, GAO Q, et al. Research on evaluation of university discipline competitiveness under the background of double first-rate[J]. J Acad Library(大学图书馆学报), 2018, (2):45-51.
{{custom_fnGroup.title_cn}}
脚注
{{custom_fn.content}}